4 Democrat states DEFYING new federal vaccine guidelines to allow doctors and pharmacists to give deadly jabs to young babies and pregnant women

Big Pharma and the Democrat-run Deep-State States are defying federal vaccine initiatives to clean up the vaccine industry and save lives, including millions of children. Trump and RFK Jr. are spearheading the swamp draining of pharma shills that run the CDC, FDA and the Vaccine Industrial Complex, but Leftist states are fighting them tooth and nail.

• Multiple U.S. states are breaking from federal agencies like the CDC and FDA to set their own COVID-19 vaccine rules, with alliances forming in both the West Coast and Northeast to issue independent immunization guidelines.
• Proponents argue these moves counteract what they see as politicized federal decision-making, but critics warn that fragmented, state-by-state vaccine policies could cause public confusion, increase health risks, and raise serious legal liability questions.
• Some states, including Washington, New Jersey, and New York, are authorizing “off-label” vaccine use for children and broader populations, aligning with recommendations from groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics — organizations critics say are heavily influenced by pharmaceutical industry funding.
• Experts caution that these state-level initiatives, framed as “science-based,” may ultimately be driven by politics and corporate interests, potentially undermining national public health policy, exposing states to lawsuits, and deepening partisan divides over vaccine policy in America.

‘Dangerous games’: States defy federal agencies, create their own COVID-19 vaccine rules

Across the United States, states are increasingly defying federal health agencies by creating their own COVID-19 vaccine rules. This wave of independent policymaking highlights widening partisan divides in public health and raises legal, ethical, and safety concerns.

Four Western states — California, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii — recently formed the West Coast Health Alliance, pledging to develop their own immunization guidelines. Washington immediately issued a standing order authorizing providers to vaccinate anyone over 6 months old, including pregnant women, without prescriptions. Similarly, northeastern states are signaling a regional alliance, with New York Gov. Kathy Hochul declaring a “statewide disaster emergency” to preserve vaccine access and authorizing pharmacists to administer COVID-19 shots broadly.

Massachusetts went further by becoming the first state to require insurers to cover the vaccines. Minnesota, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Nevada, and New Mexico also enacted measures that contradict the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) recent decision restricting vaccine authorization to higher-risk groups.

These state-level decisions sparked intense criticism. Governors of California, Oregon, and Washington accused the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of becoming politicized and untrustworthy. Conversely, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) condemned state leaders for pushing unscientific policies during the pandemic, warning that fragmented rules will erode trust further. Florida took a different approach altogether: Gov. Ron DeSantis and Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo announced the elimination of all vaccine mandates, including school entry requirements.

Experts caution that these moves risk deepening political polarization in public health. Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., noted the emergence of two ideologically split “public health states” — red and blue. Author James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., called such maneuvering “dangerous games,” arguing that politics should not dictate healthcare. Pediatrician Michelle Perro echoed this, stressing that fragmented, state-by-state vaccine rules undermine consistent national standards.

Legal experts also warn of potential liability risks. Some states are endorsing “off-label” vaccine use — such as for young children — which could expose providers to lawsuits if injuries occur. Although the PREP Act shields manufacturers and providers under federal emergency use authorizations, it may not cover states deliberately expanding eligibility beyond federal guidelines. Attorneys predict challenges under state administrative law and conflicts with federal insurance regulations.

Critics further argue that states are aligning with Big Pharma-linked organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Vaccine Integrity Project, which receive substantial funding from pharmaceutical companies and wealthy donors. The AAP, for instance, recommends vaccination for infants as young as 6 months despite federal rollbacks, a stance some experts say prioritizes industry interests over independent science.

Supporters counter that state-led alliances are necessary to maintain vaccine access after the federal government narrowed eligibility. Some states are even considering bulk vaccine purchasing agreements to secure supplies independently. This mirrors the Western States Pact of 2020, when several governors coordinated COVID restrictions and were among the last to lift mask mandates.

Ultimately, the trend toward state-by-state vaccine policymaking raises profound questions about the future of U.S. public health. While states argue they are safeguarding access and science-based care, critics warn that fragmented rules, political motivations, and pharmaceutical influence may erode national cohesion, create legal vulnerabilities, and compromise safety. As Lyons-Weiler put it, when politics dictates public health, “these are dangerous games.”

Bookmark Vaccines.news to your favorite independent websites for updates on experimental gene therapy injections still being pushed by tyrannical state leaders (elite pharma shills) in the USA.

Sources for this article include:

ChildrensHealthDefense.org 1

ChildrensHealthDefense.org 2

TheHill.com